http://katielikesblue.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/snow-white-huntsman-1024x819.jpg |
I did not actually
want to watch the movie, but I had 4 hrs to kill in a mall with limited funds
(therefore no shopping) and the movies that were showing were either: a.) I had
already seen or b.) I did not want to waste my money on. So, Snow White was a
compromise. Aside from my dislike for the actress in the lead role, I just
wasn't sold on the "re-telling" of the fairytale because, let's face
it - so many others have tried it before. However, I liked both Charlize Theron
and Chris Hemsworth (a lot) enough for me to get through 2hrs worth of Kristen
Stewart. Well, to sum it up- it wasn't LOTR but I didn't mind paying for it
either.
It has all the
elements we're familiar with regarding the fairytale - Snow white and her
backstory, the step queen, dwarves, apples, and the huntsman in a more
prominent role. They've also added more magic and even borrowed some elements
from other fairytales (but I leave the discovery of which is which to you when
you do watch the movie). The story in itself was well-developed enough, relying
on flashbacks and mini-soliloquies to act as footnotes to the story. However,
this might not be something for the really young as there are quite a number of
connections and explanations to be said. I'm no longer a child, yet I myself
have questions, such as: 1. How did Snow White become the "one"
savior? I feel that the connection between the Step Queen and Snow wasn't fully
elucidated; 2. Where did the magic come from? Granted that the Step Queen's
mother was a witch, then did that mean Snow's mother was a witch, too, by
virtue of the charm that was cast on Snow, albeit unknowingly? Or did it signify
that goodness is innate and evil has to be worked on with spells and incantations? 3. And those apples, even if they were shown
in the beginning, how did the Step Queen know to use them to bait Snow? Or is
it because she knows everything? Did the mirror tell her? 4. But the most
important of them all - why didn't the queen just kill Snow? She already
mentioned in the beginning that she knew of the beauty-capacity of Snow, so why
not suck her right then and there? Maybe
the answers to these questions were hidden within the movie, and I just wasn't
paying that much attention or haven't analyzed enough to realize their
significance. But despite all these questions, I was satisfied with the
storyline. Everything I mentioned is just my obssesive compulsive nature to
have things wrapped neatly and in a pretty bow. After all, you can only do so
much with 2 hrs.
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSF0P_zuYwv7YMo3YAqKWE_ lO3UDtjxTqGXWkgKvX1siAd36VSYWoZTk2Iq |
On the upside, what
struck me most was the seamless CGI and make-up, particularly the aging of the
Step Queen. The cinematography is also worth mentioning. My favorite scenes
were Snow lost in the Dark
Forest and the funeral
pyre, where the camera pans up as the dancing orange-red flames reach up into
the dark night sky. Kudos to the concept of the "Santuary" where its
unworldliness was palpable.
Something I
appreciated from the film was its aim to be as grounded in reality as possible.
Obviously, it was set in medieval times, and so the set and props tried to
reflect that time period. Although reflecting back on it, they probably mixed
up some facts from various time periods. While watching, I heard the confusion
of some people that the Step Queen's mirror was not a mirror at all...that in
itself should already be a clue. Of course I'm not well-versed with ancient
weaponry and military strategies, but I believe some methods and forms they
used are based on actuallity. Perhaps,
that's what had me confused somewhat - the mix of reality and magic together.
http://trueclassics.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/ snow-white-forest.jpg |
On another note, I don't know if this movie has any connection with Disney, but watch the afore-mentioned Snow getting lost in the forest scene... Doesn't it seem familiar? And even the animals that Snow was friendly with in the animated version were re-worked here to have a more active role.
http://www.breakingdawnmovie.org/images/ snow_white_and_the_huntsman_ver10.jpg |
https://encrypted-tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTGpn P8V6AblXtNwZbBj39CIFpXoUHkWC7PTw3b122PdWWkS3jUTg |
With regards the Step
Queen, Charlize Theron was perfect. She is trully beautiful and regal, and a
true actress because who else could manipulate her beauty to become hard to the
point of ugliness? I must say though that her accent at times was a little
confusing to listen to. I don't know if it was intentionally done, but there
was a marked difference between the acting of Theron and Stewart, almost as if
to illustrate the difference between their characters. One was larger than life
in her actions, using the full breadth of her arms to gesticulate; whereas the
latter was quite reserved in her actions. Did this symbolize that evil was
ostentacious and all smoke and mirrors? While good was quiet but strong?
Whatever the case, I enjoyed Theron as the Step Queen. Next, Angelina Jolie as
Maleficent...
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ9ADE13JwSmZmcs NqFx4uKLawspL7RR_Mvd9ANPNqB0aOKnzWJz9n-8tIpOQ |
Fresh from seeing him
as Thor in Avengers, Chris Hemsworth as the Huntsman just seemed to be a
dirtier, more drunk version of that former character. Fortunately enough, the
story propels the watcher into its universe and you eventually lose sight of
Hemsworth as an individual and he becomes the Hunstman. It was a little
confusing at first, that he should suddenly turn against giving up Snow upon
seeing her, and even the lackluster explanation near the end wasn't that much
satisfying. At least, there was no overt tones of romance between the Huntsman
and Snow, as I was afraid there might be. I know some people may argue with me
on this, but I really feel that the turnning point at the end wasn't a
declaration of romantic love but of... True love. Almost agape-ish. Or maybe
that's just wishful thinking on my part because I just want Hemsworth to end up
with Natalie Portman (whoops, wrong movie!). After all, if they really wanted
to play up the romance card, then they should have highlighted some sort of
rivalry between him and William, Snow's childhood friend. Although, there was
one scene come to think of it.... But I think the writer and director of this
film had higher aspirations than to focus on some love story. In hindsight, the
character of the Huntsman was almost just a means to a way, and I think that if
this was a true story, the Huntsman was incidental, and that Snow could have
been helped by any other person; it just so happened to be him.
http://www.aceshowbiz.com/images/still/snow-white-huntsman-image06.jpg |
https://encrypted-tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTV m00h1_epcKojADwznwq6OajbkDPOXJ1WKBG20csDkOSCjBtC |
The prince charming
was not a prince charming per se. The character was actually the son of a
trusted duke of Snow's father, who grew up with her. However, because of
inevitable circumstances, they were separated. When the movie proper begins, he
learns her whereabouts and searches for her, using ALL necessary means. Now
then, if I was someone who had not seen a decent (decent being the operative
word here) man for many years, and suddenly had to choose between the hunstman
and the duke's son... I personally would choose the hunstman. William, the name
of the character, unfortunately pales in
manliness beside Hemsworth's
character. Don't get me wrong, William can hold his own during battles with a
bow and arrow (just as I wrote this, it occurred to me - William Tell, is that
you?!?), but the Huntsman's agility to yield an axe is more impressive. Maybe
William's character was suppose to serve as a point of dilemma, but I feel that
if so, then that wasn't even explored fully (barely even hinted at one point).
Although the presence of his character did serve as a turning point, I think
something else could have done about it. Personally, William was superflous.
But the actor is cute, I'll give him that.
As a special mention,
the dwarves was a welcome treat. They were obviously for comedic relief and a
certain awwww factor, but it wasn't overtly so, and they were able to stand on
their own. Although, the dialogue of Bob Hoskin's character was a little
cryptic and left one hungry for more. Also, there was too much of their
backstory which I think was not needed. On the other hand, I'm happy that they
weren't made into caricatures of what people are used to, and handled just like
any normal-sized character. The effects and camera angling was also good in
showing the height discrepancies without being too forced. Although, I just
learned recently that there was an issue regarding the employment of
normal-sized actors instead of vertically-challenged persons.
http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Dwarves-in-Snow-White-and-the-Huntsman-.jpg |
If I had children with
me, perhaps the one lesson I want them to leave with is that fairytales are not
bible truth. Happiness and happy endings should not be based on finding another
person, but on yourself. Fight for your right towards a happy ending! And true love's kiss is not necessarily romantic in
nature. After all, is a parent's love for their children any less true? Or two friends for each other?
I'd say that in a summary, the movie was pretty successful in giving another version of this fairytale.
http://kentonmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Snow-White-and-The-Huntsman-01.jpg |
No comments:
Post a Comment